the lord’s prayer: from technology to relationship

I originally posted this a few years ago. In light of my recent posts from Steve Harper’s Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense that looked at Lord’s Prayer (part one and two), I thought I’d re-post it now.

How often are our questions about prayer concerned with the “technology” of prayer, that is, the “how to” question? In this approach, the point is to enlist prayer in helping me acheive my purposes. So, it is important to discover “what works” in prayer. This can lead to the “cosmic Santa Claus” view of prayer: God exists to give me what I want as long as I’m reasonably good and maybe even if I’m not.

But Jesus’ life and his teaching of the Lord’s Prayer subjugates the “technology” or “how to” question to the “relationship” or “who with” question. As the late Quaker philosophy professor and spiritual writer Douglas Steere reminds us in Dimensions of Prayer, “Unless there is a God of whom we can say with Ignatius of Loyola, ‘I come from God, I belong to God, I return to God,’ prayer is a mockery.”

The primary issue, the focal question in prayer and in learning to pray is not “how” but “who.”

In fact, because this question of who is the proper end of prayer, it is also the best beginning. After all, this is likely the true reason we began to pray in the first place–to see if God was “out there.” But perhaps we wanted to see if God was out there because we were attracted to the prospect of having another person to bargain with and manipulate as we sometimes do with our other realtionships in order to get what we think we want. As soon as we verified his existence and whereabouts, we turned to what we could gain for ourselves. It is here that we see one of the gracious, purifying works of God in prayer: that of denying our consumption temptation by refusing to be a commodity and thereby laying a foundation within our relationship with him for all other relationships that we share.

Because God ultimately moves us from technology (how to get it to work out in the way I’d like) to relationship (who I’m growing in love and fellowship with), we are freed from the technology approach to our relationships with family, friends, strangers, even ourselves. When the disciples asked Jesus in Luke 11, “Lord, teach us to pray” and when Jesus is teaching on how to practice spiritual devotion in Matthew 6, he offered a prayer that would carry his hearers, and us, from the “how to” of technology to the “who with” of relationship.

It is here that genuine intimacy is possible (“Our Father, who art in heaven”). It is here that we acknowledge him and his purpose first (“hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thy will be done”). It is here that our requests are not so much ways to get what we think we need as they are ways of entrusting our lives more fully into his care because we know him and his love for us (“give us daily bread, forgive our sins, lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil”).

We come from God, we belong to God, we return to God. To him alone be “the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.”

talking in the dark 19

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

In the previous post on this book, we covered the first half of the Lord’s Prayer. Let’s complete our look at this prayer today.

By way of introduction, Steve Harper points out that when we transition from the phases that center our petitioning in God and what he wants, we see how the first three petitions “set the boundaries that enable us to then move into making specific requests for ourselves” (p. 105). The “us” phrases that follow are clearly focused on our needs, but “are correct and safe only when preceded by the view of God and ourselves that he first section of the prayer provides.”

Give us daily bread

Notice the plural, “us.” Now that we are formed by the first half of the prayer and re-oriented around God’s character and what he desires, even when we pray for ourselves, we pray not only for our needs, bur for the needs of “us” – all who are in need of God’s provision. Steve points out that “we pray for the bread we need, not necessarily all the bread we want. That is, we pray as stewards, not consumers.” (p. 106)

Forgive Us

Again with the “us.” We may not speak in terms of sin and guilt, but they are real. And we need forgiveness. We are obsessed about guilty feelings, which are not insignificant. But it seems to me that our interest in not being made to feel guilty about something we’ve done, are doing, or want to do, serves as a distraction from discerning whether or not we are guilty. So Jesus teaches us to forgive and to seek forgiveness.

Lead us away from temptation… deliver us

Think about this: Everyone has “a ‘first day’ of temptation—a moment when the temptation resembled a flicker more than a fire, or a pesky fly more than a savage beast” (p. 108). But temptation grows when it is not resisted, when it is not dealt with. Steve points us to the classic prayer from Psalm 139:23-24 as a way to deal with temptation before it has its way with us: “Search me, God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.”

Praying “deliver us” acknowledges that God can deliver, can save. That’s why “despair,” as Steve says, “is not the final word in the Christian’s vocabulary; hope is.” (p. 111)

ashes and intimacy (re-post)

I wrote this a year ago and thought I’d re-post it with the beginning of Lent this past Wednesday.

As silent figures amble from the sanctuary Wednesday night, we begin observing the Lenten season. During the imposition of ashes, I always get reflective.

There is something about each face that presents itself before me to receive the smudgy cross, to hear the lovely morbid words, “Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return,” and the bare call to conversion, “Repent and believe the gospel.” This is intimacy, with all its playful shyness and awkward terror –flesh pressed against flesh, the truth about our common humanity briefly acknowledged. As I meet eyes with person after person, I smile. It seems the least I can do before administering these naked and forceful words.

As I place the ashes on forehead after forehead, I ponder each one. Teenagers come, death and mortality juxtaposed defiantly against their clumsy adolescent vibrancy. Older folks come, sage eyes speaking the deep truth of the liturgy back to me even though my lips are the only ones moving. Mothers and fathers come, mindful, prayerful, spiritual, yes, but wanting their visions of graduations and weddings and careers and grandchildren to be truer than the ashy truth of this night.

Pastors know the rules of the trade. No pressing the ashes harder on some persons than on others. Use the same amount of ashes with everyone. Do not be more eager to impose some than others. Having sat in committee meetings, hospital rooms, school plays, and soccer games with these people, we may have a list of specific sins of which to be repented. But they know ours as well, the narcissisms common to the baptized. This is real worship in the beloved community of death and gospel, ashes and intimacy.

—-

We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. (2 Corinthians 4:10 NIV)

 

talking in the dark 18

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

After Steve’s beginning reflection on the difference between thinking as a “self” versus thinking as a “person” (see previous post), he moves into the practical application of that point in how the Lord’s Prayer can shape our praying. He says, “To be a person is to be like God, who is a Person. And this likeness to God (imago dei) is the starting point for praying for ourselves.” (p. 102)

Our

When we conceive of ourselves as a “self” we are considering ourselves isolated individuals. But when recognize that we are persons, we see that we are in relationship—first, to God, and second, to others. Steve witnesses to this insight’s effect on his praying: “Therefore, I will pray for myself with the spirit that says, ‘God, I ask only those things for myself that will glorify you and make me a fuller and finer member of the human family.’”

Father

Praying in a relational act, not a transactional one. It is family conversation with the God who is the parent any good father or mother strives to be like and any poor father or mother should have been. Good parents work for what is best for the child, whether the child understands and agrees to that or not. “The One to whom we pray is the one who made us, loves us, and wants to do more for us than we can ask or imagine” (p. 103).

In Heaven

This does not mean that “God is distant or aloof” (p. 104). Rather, “when I prayer for myself, I pray against the backdrop of the eternal and unchanging.” We can depend on God, and our praying can lean into God’s dependability in the face of our immediate reality.

Thy kingdom come / Thy Will Be Done on Earth as it is in Heaven

There is a realm in which God’s reign is perfectly followed and lived out. We want our world to be more like that. I once heard Dallas Willard say something to this effect: the point is not merely about getting us to heaven when we die; the point is getting heaven into us while we’re alive on earth. Amen. Praying the Lord’s Prayer this way asks for God to get heaven into us—individually and collectively—while we are on earth. “Rather than being egocentric selves, we are persons abandoned to God—people who want God’s will to be done, not their own. We pray for ourselves as consecrated and yielded selves.” (p. 105)

In the next post, we’ll take up the second half of the Lord’s Prayer.

receiving the gift of lent

At this point in a new year, I am usually struck by how quickly the weeks have passed and how it is not at all new anymore. Just as winter gives way to spring (in weather if not strictly by the calendar), the Christian year keeps marching along too. All of the preparation for a special Christmas season now seems so long ago. But soon we are entering one of the other more significant times of the year for Christians: Lent.

Lent is a season of preparation. We have Easter in our sights, looking forward to the event that gives Christians our profound joy and hope. But, lest we forget Jesus’ path to that first Easter morning, we first take the season of Lent to hear Jesus’ call to “take up your cross and follow” and to pay attention to the way he took up his cross and followed God’s purpose for him. The biblical word for that is “discipleship.”

In Lent, there is a tradition of picking something to “give up for Lent”–to practice self-denial somehow, whether in a small or large way, in order to focus on Jesus and the fact that he practiced self-denial in the most significant way imaginable. This sort of practice–a concrete way to help us focus on God–is typically called a “spiritual discipline.” Spiritual disciplines include habits like prayer, Scripture reading, fasting (from food or something else), intentional gratitude, and the like.

John Ortberg, a prominent pastor and author, has expressed the frustration of many when he read a book describing 12 spiritual disciplines, confessing, “I felt like I was already not reading the Bible and praying enough–now I have ten more activities I have to feel guilty about?”

But that frustration did not diminish his commitment to deliberate spiritual growth. Thankfully, he shares insights he discovered that helped him move forward:

On the other hand, I don’t just drift into spiritual growth. So how do I know what spiritual practices might be helpful to me? Here’s one of the most helpful insights I know, courtesy of Dallas Willard.

Sins can be divided into two types:

1. Sins of Omission (lovelessness, joylessness-–things I DON’T do)

2. Sins of Commission (lying, gossiping-–things I DO)

Disciplines can be divided into two related types:

1. Disciplines of Engagement (study, worship-–things I DO)

2. Disciplines of Abstinence (fasting, solitude–-things I DON’T DO)

Generally–when I wrestle with a sin of Omission, I will be helped by a discipline of engagement. For instance, if I struggle with joylessness I will be helped by the practice of celebration. If I struggle with being miserly I will be helped by the practice of giving.

When I wrestle with a sin of Commission, I will be helped by a practice of Abstinence. If I struggle with gossip I will be helped by practicing silence; if I wrestle with ‘impression management’ I will be helped by solitude.

I encourage you to pick something to give up, practicing a discipline of abstinence, this Lent, beginning on Ash Wednesday, March 9, and going through Easter Sunday, April 24. And I encourage you to pick something to do, practicing a discipline of engagement as well.

What distraction can you lay aside that will help you focus on Christ? What habit can you practice that will help you focus on Christ?

That is one of the true gifts of the Christian season of Lent–finding practical ways to focus our attention and devotion to Christ. How do you plan receive that gift this year?

talking in the dark 17

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

Chapter 8 of Talking in the Dark is titled “Praying for Yourself.” Steve begins by sharing the concern of a woman who attended a prayer workshop he was leading. “She remarked that she was weary of praying ‘give me, get me’ prayers” (p. 101). I’ll share the first part of his response here, which deals with our misunderstanding of ourselves.

It is, of course, alright to pray for ourselves. Plenty of biblical stories tell of people praying for themselves and many of the psalms are prayers offered to God with specific requests.

When there is darkness in praying for ourselves, what is at issue?

Steve tells us that the problem is our secular, rather than biblical, notion of the self: “The secular notion tells me I am an independent, individual self that is supposed to be affirmed and actualized. In other words, we are egocentric.” (p. 102)

But the bible tells a different story. “Instead of the psychologized understanding that I am a self, the Bible teaches that I am a person.” To say we are persons is to say that we are made in the image of God (imago dei is the Latin phrase). Understanding ourselves as persons in the image of God, imago dei, is square one for praying for ourselves. “Fundamentally, imago dei means that I am a being in relation to others. …As a self, it is possible to understand life in isolation. But when I realize that I am a person, I understand that I am always in community.”

When realize that we are “persons in community” rather than “individualized selves,” the way we pray for ourselves is different. The “give me, get me” prayers the woman was weary of are the prayers of an egocentric individualized self. The truer prayer for oneself as a person is praying that seeks what will help us glorify God and become “a fuller and finer member of the human family.”

In the next post, we’ll look at how the Lord’s Prayer helps us to pray as persons.

 

talking in the dark 16

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

Today I want to share one last post on discoveries concerning intercessory prayer, praying for others. I have only one discovery from Steve remaining to share, but it is a practical one with more application options.

The Management of Prayer

That may seem like an awkward discovery to make, but Steve points out that “the mystery and magnitude of prayer can overwhelm us if we are not careful.” Going through a lengthy list on a daily basis can become stale or seem needlessly redundant. That sounds awful to say, but I’m willing to bet that most people have felt that way and, of course, felt guilty about feeling that way.

But practical organization is okay, and maybe even to be preferred. Steve tells us that “John Wesley divided his intercessions over a seven-day cycle.” He had a focus for each day—virtues to cultivate and persons or situations for which to pray.

Steve reports his own pattern for years: “to use a weekly cycle with people and topics recurring once a week.” In addition to this, he includes a monthly prayer list for people and ministries to lift up in prayer.

Also, prayer guides can be helpful. Different Christian traditions have different approaches that can be used to structure one’s praying. The Book of Common Prayer is a good example, as is Phyllis Tickle’s The Divine Hours series of prayer books. Steve reports using various resources from Protestant, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox traditions, adding, “I do this as a way of ensuring that I am praying with the whole church, not just my preferred part of it” (p. 97).

Scripture itself is a rich resource for intercessory prayer. “Weaving its way throughout my intercession is my growing comfort in praying the scriptures back to God. …Sometimes I find that praying the Word gives me a perspective on my intercession that I would not have if I had limited my praying to my own words.”

Final Thoughts

Most important is developing a heart for intercessory prayer. “I believe it is an expression of God’s heart for the world,” Steve writes. And intercession can be our point of contact with God’s heart that moves us to action. The missionary Frank Laubach “began each day praying, ‘God, what are you doing in the world today that I can help you with?’” (p. 98). That is a prayer that seeks how God may want to use us as an answer to intercessory prayer—our prayers, or others’.

Finally, Steve reminds us that whatever the difficulties we might have understanding intercessory prayer, “it is not the most difficult to practice. …Here’s a suggestion: use the time you might normally spend trying to figure out intercessory prayer to pray for others.”

 

talking in the dark 15

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

We pick up today where we left off in the last post on intercessory prayer, or praying for others. When we wonder about intercessory prayer—how it works and whether we are making a difference—we make several discoveries when we ask our questions as earnest seekers rather than cynics. In the last post, we once again acknowledged mystery. Here are some more discoveries when we investigate intercessory prayer.

The Need to Be Absolutely Honest With Your Questions

Steve shares a helpful tool for assessing how honest we are before God. Imagine the pain chart at the doctor’s office or hospital room with the words “no pain” under a smiley face and “worst possible pain” under a contorted face. When a patient is asked where they are on the chart, they must be honest. Their responses determine the treatment. “Likewise, in prayer, if we lose honestly with ourselves and our situation, we determine who much assistance we are willing to receive from the Great Physician. …Nothing good comes from… denial” (p. 91).

Realizing That Intercession Has Been the Consistent Practice of God’s People

“The saints prayed for others, and they did so believing they were doing something that pleased God and had meaning” (p. 92). They did so in good times and bad, in encouraging conditions or discouraging situations. Further, not only was Jesus a constant intercessor in his earthly ministry (even praying for his crucifiers from the cross!), Hebrews 7:25 teaches that he continues his ministry of intercession at the right hand of God.

So why not learn about intercession from the many that practiced it faithfully? “We want to learn from the best examples [the saints], not the worst ones [the skeptics]. Why should prayer be any different?” Look to church history for solid examples. Renovare’s Devotional Classics and Spiritual Classics collections are a great resource here.

Learning to Pray Your Heart’s Desire

When we don’t know what to pray for in a given situation, perhaps because we’re not confident about what we should pray for, it is okay to simply pray what we desire and entrust the situation or the person to God’s wisdom and care. Instead of getting bogged down in what we don’t know and haven’t figured out, just act on what we do know. Honestly praying for our heart’s desire and trusting God for the best outcome—physical healing, some kind of provision, etc—is a good way to pray. “Such intercession puts prayer in the right arrangement,” Steve reminds us. “Our part is to pray; God’s part is to weave everything into the tapestry of the divine will” (p. 95).

talking in the dark 14

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

Chapter 7 is titled, “Praying for Others,” and deals with intercessory prayer. Here there are plenty of questions. The most obvious and plainly stated is this: What difference does it make? Since the connection between intercession and answer is not as predictable as we would like, this is a reasonable question.

But our motive in asking it is critical. Are we asking as cynics, always questioning but never praying (honest frustration is not the same as cynicism)? Or are we genuinely interested in growing as pray-ers? The latter motive is clearly the healthier stance. Approached from this angle, there are several discoveries to be made. We’ll begin looking at them here, and finish looking at them in the next post or two.

We Find Mystery

This is a truth we’ve been acknowledging steadily through this book, but it’s worth saying again. But Steve helpfully points out that he lives with mystery in lots of areas of life: “We operate machinery, use technology, travel…, do business, and form relationships without understanding how everything works. But we press on” (pp. 88-89). The same is true in intercessory prayer. We don’t understand how everything works, but we press on, hopefully. Admitting that some people struggle harder than others with unanswered prayers, Steve confesses, “I must tell you that intercessory prayer was saved for me when I realized that I did not have to understand it in order to practice it” (p. 89). That strikes me as just the sort of obvious and useful point that we need to hear when we wrestle with the question, “What difference does it make?”

Here’s a final admission about the mystery of intercessory prayer that I found convicting and helpful. Steve writes: “I had to come to the place where I could acknowledge that faith I can understand is actually faith in myself, not in God. One of the prerequisites for intercession is an ‘unknowing’ that takes me out of the center of things and allows God to dwell there” (p. 89).

who’s problem is it?

Check this review of the book Evangelical vs. Liberal: The Clash of Christian Cultures in the Pacific Northwest at BooksandCulture.com.

The quote that grabbed my attention was this:

“The liberal churches,” in contrast, “would often complain about the lack of children and youth programs … yet were unwilling to change their services to appeal to families, young children, or youth.” Even more telling was the way that evangelicals and liberals differed on their approach to youth ministry. “For evangelicals,” Wellman concluded, “if children and youth are not enjoying church, it is the church’s fault and evangelical parents either find a new church or try to improve their youth ministry. For liberals, the tendency is the reverse; if youth do not find the church interesting, it is the youths’ problem.”

Now, the way these two groups are contrasted in this study is unique to the location and parameters of the study, so I have no broad brushes with which to paint (to my friends who are liberal, as well as those who are evangelical). My concern is missional.

My interest is the view of who has the burden to be faithful in our work of reaching and discipling our children and youth. I think that issue presses all of our local churches. What is the answer when we discover we are missing the next generation? Well, I do try to avoid being reactionary and knee-jerk because I don’t think that’s helpful.

But the question surfaced in this research is, “When children and youth are not being reached, who’s problem is it?” Here, I absolutely agree with the evangelical churches in the study (and, to be clear and fair, I have liberal friends I know have the same posture).

I remember something said once by a friend who is a college pastor, expressing frustration that college students active in campus ministries were not always quickly finding a church home in our United Methodist local congregations. His response: “It isn’t my job to make our ministry less vibrant and more boring in order to keep their expectations lower.” Ouch… but a point worth hearing.

Our congregation is doing a great job of reaching and engaging children and youth. But the question is worth keeping in front of us in our good times too, lest we forget.

I pray I’m doing my part in engaging the next generation effectively and being a faithful disciple of Jesus and co-laborer for the gospel with my congregation. That’s a prayer I’ll be putting in to practice in a specific way this Sunday when I begin teaching our Confirmation class.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.