Living God’s Story

“For I know the plans I have you,” declares the Lord, “…plans to give you a hope and a future.” (Jer 29:11)

Imagine this scene. A diverse group of persons arrive at the community theater one evening to begin working on the play they will perform a few months from now. The annual production is a tradition in this small town and they are both excited and nervous about getting started. The director distributes the scripts.

The group begins flipping through the script and one person after another makes an odd discovery. There is an entire section missing from the book. Shortly after the climax of the plot, the next act is missing. A page or two, which seems to be the final few scenes, is stapled on at the back. Perplexed, the actors cast sideways glances at one another. Finally, one speaks up and asks the director, “Where is the missing act? How are we supposed to perform that part of the story?”

A playful smile crosses the director’s face as he responds, “That’s the part you’ll improvise.”

“Improvise!?!”

Heart rates pick up a bit as the actors start wondering what they’ve gotten themselves into.

Sound familiar? It should. This “improvisation” we call Christian living is based on (1) knowing the story thus far (in the bible) and (2) knowing and trusting the Author—God, for the ending.

“Hope” is about who or what we believe has the last word on how the story ends. The actors will improvise differently depending on how they think the story ends. We will live differently based on who or what we believe holds our story’s end—global financial markets, our children’s accomplishments, our achievements at work, our political party’s success, our moral excellence, and a host of other things.

Only with our Hope in Christ alone can we live faithfully in relation to everyone and everything else in our lives. That true hope is what our church exists to inspire in people. We begin inspiring that hope in others when it lives in us.

So be grounded in the Story of God in Scripture and trust Christ with your Hope for the future. The Author has handed out the script. And He gives His Spirit to guide us as we live day-to-day faithfully and boldly.

Coming soon: Blogging Mere Christianity

I’ve been re-reading CS Lewis’ classic book, Mere Christianity, this summer. In doing so, I keep thinking of so many people I’d like to share the experience of reading it with.

A couple of years ago, I worked through it afresh with small group of men. It took us about eight months, going chapter-by-chapter through the book. It was probably the best thing we studied.

So, I’ve decided to share some of it here on my blog. I invite you to read along whether you own a ragged old copy or would be picking it up for the first time. Be sure to subscribe to this blog for free updates if this is something that would interest you.

CS Lewis is a wonderful writer and a great companion on the journey of faith. He will make you think. As he says in one chapter, God “wants a child’s heart but a grown-up’s head.” Reading Lewis is a fine way to cultivate both. So he requires your thinking cap. That probably sounds exhilarating to some but stressful to others. I’m no expert on Lewis, but I’m interested in sharing the experience of reading the book with others, so if I can serve as a guide of sorts, then great.

In the meantime, pick up a copy if you don’t have one already. If you have a copy, pull it down from the shelf and dust it off.

First chapter coming soon.

summer reading 2011 thoughts

Okay, I’m taking suggestions for summer reading. I’m curious what others are reading and what others would recommend. So, here’s a bit of background. Then I’ll invite you to make your recommendations.

Books I’ve read this year so far (aside from the Bible):

  • Tao Te Ching, by Lao Tsu
  • The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, by CS Lewis
  • Grace to Lead: Practicing Leadership in the Wesleyan Tradition, by Ken Carder & Laceye Warner
  • Friedman’s Fables, by Edwin Friedman
  • Prayer: Does It Make Any Difference?, by Philip Yancey
  • Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense, by Steve Harper
  • Winnie the Pooh, by AA Milne (aloud with Ben)
  • You Only Have to Die: Leading Your Congregation to New Life, by James Harnish
  • Prince Caspian, by CS Lewis
  • Love Wins: Heaven, Hell, and the Fate of Every Person Who Ever Lived, by Rob Bell
  • The Me I Want To Be: Becoming God’s Best Version of You, by John Ortberg
  • Visioneering: God’s Blueprint for Developing and Maintaining Vision, by Andy Stanley
  • The Meaning of Jesus: Two Visions, by Marcus Borg and NT Wright
  • On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, by Stephen King
Books I’m currently reading and want to finish this summer:
  • Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Year 4), by JK Rowling
  • Surprised by Hope, by NT Wright
  • Christ Plays in Ten Thousand Places, by Eugene Peterson
Books I’ve already got on my list, hoping for summer:
  • Walk On: The Spiritual Journey of U2, by Steve Stockman
  • Bonhoeffer, by Eric Metaxes
  • The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, by CS Lewis
So, I read a lot of spiritual formation, biblical/theological, and leadership stuff, which I both enjoy and have an obvious work/calling connection to! But, I like fiction and history too.
What do you recommend? What’s on your summer list?

seven stanzas at easter

Seven Stanzas at Easter

By John Updike

Make no mistake: if He rose at all
it was as His body;
if the cells’ dissolution did not reverse, the molecules
reknit, the amino acids rekindle,
the Church will fall.

It was not as the flowers,
each soft Spring recurrent;
it was not as His Spirit in the mouths and fuddled
eyes of the eleven apostles;
it was as His Flesh: ours.

The same hinged thumbs and toes,
the same valved heart
that — pierced — died, withered, paused, and then
regathered out of enduring Might
new strength to enclose.

Let us not mock God with metaphor,
analogy, sidestepping transcendence;
making of the event a parable, a sign painted in the
faded credulity of earlier ages:
let us walk through the door.

The stone is rolled back, not papier-mache,
not a stone in a story,
but the vast rock of materiality that in the slow
grinding of time will eclipse for each of us
the wide light of day.

And if we will have an angel at the tomb,
make it a real angel,
weighty with Max Planck’s quanta, vivid with hair,
opaque in the dawn light, robed in real linen
spun on a definite loom.

Let us not seek to make it less monstrous,
for our own convenience, our own sense of beauty,
lest, awakened in one unthinkable hour, we are
embarrassed by the miracle,
and crushed by remonstrance.

what rome and god were both saying in the cross

All four Gospels include in their accounts the notice placed above Jesus on the cross. But the Gospel of John includes an extra piece of detail in 19:19-20:

Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: JESUS OF NAZARETH, THE KING OF THE JEWS. Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Aramaic, Latin, and Greek.

We have thought of the cross as located “on a hill far away,” like the old hymn about “the old rugged cross.” But the cross wasn’t very far away at all. The condemned were crucified just outside the city, nearby in order to serve as an example. Anyone journeying to or near the city of Jerusalem would get the message.

And in Jesus’ case in particular, the notice is written in Aramaic (or Hebrew), Latin, and Greek. What is the significance of these three languages? Aramaic was the local languages of the Jews living in the area. Latin was the language of the Roman Empire. And Greek was nearer to the universal language of the day. So, whether you were a local Jew, a Roman citizen, or a traveler on economic business, you should get the message. Today it would be something like posting a sign written in English, Chinese, and a local language.

So Jesus is crucified near the city where plenty of people would pass by and witness the sight. And the sign over him, “Jesus of Nazareth: The King of the Jews” is written to be read by persons from every conceivable background.

Rome is saying to any passerby: “This is what happens when people dare to transgress the power and sovereignty of Rome.”

And I think God is saying basically the same thing: “This is what happens when people dare to transgress the power and sovereignty of Almighty God.”

But the difference is critical, of course. For Rome, it is a message of destruction.

For God, it is a message of forgiveness.

looking for spring

When will spring be here? That’s been a question in my home for the past month or so. I live with people who love to play in the dirt and garden and see the signs of ne w life that emerge. There is a unique joy in seeing the first buds on the trees and bushes. There’s a thrill in seeing what we know is on its way actually begin to show up.

We’ve been answering that question in relation to the date on the calendar, March 21. But this is a spiritual question for us too, of course.

“When will spring be here?” can also be a way of wondering…

  • When will my work be noticed by people who matter?
  • When will my children begin making decisions I’m prouder of?
  • When will my parents meaningfully trust me?
  • When will my grief become bearable?
  • When will my faults stop dragging me down?

Thankfully, our God enjoys playing in the dirt too. He saw dirt and imagined something more. And he said, “Let us create humanity in our image” (Genesis 1:26-31). But we left the playfulness of creativity with the dirt outside. We traded that healthy enjoyment of God’s creation for idolatries that get dirt on the soul. And God again imagined something more. Jesus became like one made of dirt in order to clean us from the dirt on the soul (2 Corinthians 5:21).

The hope of Easter, the hope of resurrection, is something like buds on branches, the hope of spring. In Jesus’ resurrection, we see evidence that heaven has gained a foothold in our world and that signs of new life are beginning to show up in people’s lives and in situations that seemed hopeless.

the lord’s prayer: from technology to relationship

I originally posted this a few years ago. In light of my recent posts from Steve Harper’s Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense that looked at Lord’s Prayer (part one and two), I thought I’d re-post it now.

How often are our questions about prayer concerned with the “technology” of prayer, that is, the “how to” question? In this approach, the point is to enlist prayer in helping me acheive my purposes. So, it is important to discover “what works” in prayer. This can lead to the “cosmic Santa Claus” view of prayer: God exists to give me what I want as long as I’m reasonably good and maybe even if I’m not.

But Jesus’ life and his teaching of the Lord’s Prayer subjugates the “technology” or “how to” question to the “relationship” or “who with” question. As the late Quaker philosophy professor and spiritual writer Douglas Steere reminds us in Dimensions of Prayer, “Unless there is a God of whom we can say with Ignatius of Loyola, ‘I come from God, I belong to God, I return to God,’ prayer is a mockery.”

The primary issue, the focal question in prayer and in learning to pray is not “how” but “who.”

In fact, because this question of who is the proper end of prayer, it is also the best beginning. After all, this is likely the true reason we began to pray in the first place–to see if God was “out there.” But perhaps we wanted to see if God was out there because we were attracted to the prospect of having another person to bargain with and manipulate as we sometimes do with our other realtionships in order to get what we think we want. As soon as we verified his existence and whereabouts, we turned to what we could gain for ourselves. It is here that we see one of the gracious, purifying works of God in prayer: that of denying our consumption temptation by refusing to be a commodity and thereby laying a foundation within our relationship with him for all other relationships that we share.

Because God ultimately moves us from technology (how to get it to work out in the way I’d like) to relationship (who I’m growing in love and fellowship with), we are freed from the technology approach to our relationships with family, friends, strangers, even ourselves. When the disciples asked Jesus in Luke 11, “Lord, teach us to pray” and when Jesus is teaching on how to practice spiritual devotion in Matthew 6, he offered a prayer that would carry his hearers, and us, from the “how to” of technology to the “who with” of relationship.

It is here that genuine intimacy is possible (“Our Father, who art in heaven”). It is here that we acknowledge him and his purpose first (“hallowed be thy name, thy kingdom come, thy will be done”). It is here that our requests are not so much ways to get what we think we need as they are ways of entrusting our lives more fully into his care because we know him and his love for us (“give us daily bread, forgive our sins, lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil”).

We come from God, we belong to God, we return to God. To him alone be “the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, forever. Amen.”

talking in the dark 19

Our church journeyed through January with a focus on prayer. Our preaching series was “Questions of Prayer,” which aimed to be honest about questions we share about prayer and give us orientation points for our praying. An optional step past Sunday morning is working through Steve Harper’s book, Talking in the Dark: Praying When Life Doesn’t Make Sense.

-

In the previous post on this book, we covered the first half of the Lord’s Prayer. Let’s complete our look at this prayer today.

By way of introduction, Steve Harper points out that when we transition from the phases that center our petitioning in God and what he wants, we see how the first three petitions “set the boundaries that enable us to then move into making specific requests for ourselves” (p. 105). The “us” phrases that follow are clearly focused on our needs, but “are correct and safe only when preceded by the view of God and ourselves that he first section of the prayer provides.”

Give us daily bread

Notice the plural, “us.” Now that we are formed by the first half of the prayer and re-oriented around God’s character and what he desires, even when we pray for ourselves, we pray not only for our needs, bur for the needs of “us” – all who are in need of God’s provision. Steve points out that “we pray for the bread we need, not necessarily all the bread we want. That is, we pray as stewards, not consumers.” (p. 106)

Forgive Us

Again with the “us.” We may not speak in terms of sin and guilt, but they are real. And we need forgiveness. We are obsessed about guilty feelings, which are not insignificant. But it seems to me that our interest in not being made to feel guilty about something we’ve done, are doing, or want to do, serves as a distraction from discerning whether or not we are guilty. So Jesus teaches us to forgive and to seek forgiveness.

Lead us away from temptation… deliver us

Think about this: Everyone has “a ‘first day’ of temptation—a moment when the temptation resembled a flicker more than a fire, or a pesky fly more than a savage beast” (p. 108). But temptation grows when it is not resisted, when it is not dealt with. Steve points us to the classic prayer from Psalm 139:23-24 as a way to deal with temptation before it has its way with us: “Search me, God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me, and lead me in the way everlasting.”

Praying “deliver us” acknowledges that God can deliver, can save. That’s why “despair,” as Steve says, “is not the final word in the Christian’s vocabulary; hope is.” (p. 111)

when tying is winning

Tying is winning when winning means arriving together.

My children love racing. They challenge me to races and love to run as fast as they can to see who wins. A week or so ago, my older daughter (age 4) challenged me to a race. We lined up and at her call began to run. But only a few strides into the race she slowed down (apparently I was being pokey), said, “let’s hold hands to run,” and continued along with me until we crossed the finish line together. My son has not taken that approach yet, and my older daughter doesn’t usually. But she did that time. Tying was winning because winning that particular race meant arriving together.

So, in which races is tying winning, and in which races is it not? That’s a question I’m wrestling with, and you should too.

Tying is not winning when…

  • the race is a race to the bottom (being cheaper or faster, as Seth Godin wonderfully points out)
  • the race is toward mediocrity

Tying is winning when…

  • the race is about vision (for a person’s life, for a church’s ministry, for an organization’s work)
  • the race is about faithfulness (to God, in relationships, to a calling)
  • the race is about values (truth, goodness, compassion, justice, etc)

When is tying winning? When is it not?

ashes and intimacy (re-post)

I wrote this a year ago and thought I’d re-post it with the beginning of Lent this past Wednesday.

As silent figures amble from the sanctuary Wednesday night, we begin observing the Lenten season. During the imposition of ashes, I always get reflective.

There is something about each face that presents itself before me to receive the smudgy cross, to hear the lovely morbid words, “Remember that you are dust and to dust you shall return,” and the bare call to conversion, “Repent and believe the gospel.” This is intimacy, with all its playful shyness and awkward terror –flesh pressed against flesh, the truth about our common humanity briefly acknowledged. As I meet eyes with person after person, I smile. It seems the least I can do before administering these naked and forceful words.

As I place the ashes on forehead after forehead, I ponder each one. Teenagers come, death and mortality juxtaposed defiantly against their clumsy adolescent vibrancy. Older folks come, sage eyes speaking the deep truth of the liturgy back to me even though my lips are the only ones moving. Mothers and fathers come, mindful, prayerful, spiritual, yes, but wanting their visions of graduations and weddings and careers and grandchildren to be truer than the ashy truth of this night.

Pastors know the rules of the trade. No pressing the ashes harder on some persons than on others. Use the same amount of ashes with everyone. Do not be more eager to impose some than others. Having sat in committee meetings, hospital rooms, school plays, and soccer games with these people, we may have a list of specific sins of which to be repented. But they know ours as well, the narcissisms common to the baptized. This is real worship in the beloved community of death and gospel, ashes and intimacy.

—-

We always carry around in our body the death of Jesus, so that the life of Jesus may also be revealed in our body. (2 Corinthians 4:10 NIV)

 

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.