overheard… on younger Christians

Read this today… 

I’ve observed four small, but vital, movements energizing the Western church. The first, which sprang up in the late 1980s, is the “emerging” stream. They were committed to engaging a population, like the arts community in Liverpool, England, that would never come to either the charismatic or the traditional church. Next, the “missional” stream began in the academy as an effort to remind the church of its identity as a sent church. The third one is “mosaic,” made up of younger people planting multicultural churches. The fourth steam is the “monastics,” essentially urban Franciscans working with the poor and living in community.

These young people are challenging all of us to reexamine our assumptions about what it means to be disciples, be churches, and do mission. Because their ministries are innovative and organic, they require very little overhead. Nevertheless, these young people tend to be more generous than older generations, refusing to think of stewardship in terms of a 10 percent tithe. They’re calling us to authentic, whole-life discipleship and stewardship, and to put mission much more in the center of church life.

The person speaking is Tom Sine, Christian author and activist. His most recent book is The New Conspirators: Creating the Future One Mustard Seed at a Time, which I’ve begun to read and look forward to blogging about in early 2009. The quote above is his response to a question about how younger Christians are addressing the challenges facing the church now and in upcoming years. The whole interview is here from CT’s LeadershipJournal.net. 

tensions of my gen-x experience

I’ve been thinking lately of writing a little bit (which makes me think a little bit more) about the three terms in the title of my blog… Gen-X, Missional, Wesleyan. Each of these says something about my experience of Christianity and the Church.

I’ll begin with some tension I experience that seem to me related to my being a member of “Generation X.”

1. Idealism vs. Pragmatism. I find that I have these two conflicting ism’s duking it out inside me. On the one hand, I’m fiercely idealistic. I strive for purity of motive and action in the public sphere. I crave idealism in politics, religion, etc. and want to see authenticity in leaders of every arena. On the other hand, I find myself with a pragmatic streak when the chips are down and I want my idealistic vision to be realized. These two strains that live in tension are probably what produces the sense of angst (that quintessential Gen-X feeling) about politics, movements, and activism. I become pragmatic regarding process at the last minute when the idealistic result is on the line, but when part of my idealism includes idealizing the process…doesn’t take much to see the angst welling up on that one.

2. Community vs. Individuality. I desire community. That is an ideal for me (see above!). That said, I’m not terribly good at practicing it in real life. I’m not good at handling vulnerability, which is one of the basic building blocks of community. Better to conceptualitze it in the abstract… but live it? Are you crazy? So, though idealizing and desiring and dabbling in community, I find individuality a more comfortable, natural state. Mind you, I whole-heartedly consider individualism the artificial state and community the natural one, but in practice… ok, you see where this is going, right?

3. Optimism vs. Angst. I can be incredibly optimistic. I see a world of possibilities. Part of that is within my temperament, but I think there is something within my generational experience that also colludes with my personality on this score. I dream. I envision. At one and the same time, however, I wrestle with angst over my own and the world’s lack of inertia in moving meaningfully toward the optimistic dream. Perhaps the pace is too slow.

4. Movement vs. Institution. Typical of Gen-Xers, I have some built-in distrust of large, lumbering, vertical (that is, hierarchical and top-down) bureaucratic institutions. I’m more attracted to the organic and more horizontal (that is, less hierarchical and flatter) nature of a movement. This one relates strongly to my experience as a United Methodist, in particular as a pastor in the UMC. Methodism began as a movement. That is a part of the Wesleyan/Methodist narrative. But at present, the United Methodist Church is not a movement; it is a large, lumbering, vertical bureaucratic institution. But it is my theological and ecclesiological home, so in a sense, I’m stuck with it.

Any other Gen-Xers out there hearing me on this? What about you?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.